Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 13:56:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mktemp() vs. mkstemp() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005141355390.66774-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200005141849.OAA21071@rac10.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 May 2000, James Howard wrote:
> I was preparing a port which uses mktemp(). Of course, the linker
> complained and suggested using mkstemp(). Except mkstemp() returns an
> integer file descriptor whereas normal people use FILE * pointers,
> including the author of this port. How about an mkftemp() which wraps
> around mkstemp() and does an fdopen()?
This would be completely non-portable - if you really need this, make one
yourself and add it to a library distributed with your code.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005141355390.66774-100000>