Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:55:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C8=99or?= <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> To: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> Cc: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: lib/clan/llvm.build.mk: Shouldn't BUILD_TRIPLE definition rely host 'cc -dumpmachine'? Message-ID: <CAK0XTWegCL58jDtMs2YMqcxZWGv16tOX-wbWdc=iLFLeuFctpQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAK0XTWdRjek6StRktBfn0oGMo1ixTohs6NPoyDx__QMQ56ki_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAK0XTWczya8vg_sQZPqz-ZyYZRMq1v6p%2Bjs90S%2BjaDHxo2=1gA@mail.gmail.com> <CDAA0CB5-F1FC-40FE-AEC5-56FD64654671@FreeBSD.org> <7CAFD8CC-BDA1-4E89-BD7E-D0089E27036F@dsl-only.net> <CAK0XTWdRjek6StRktBfn0oGMo1ixTohs6NPoyDx__QMQ56ki_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2017-10-29 9:51 GMT+02:00 Eddy Petri=C8=99or <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>: > Various linux distributions > > patch uname and its -p code (for > example). Even for the same kernel > being in use, giving different > textual results. -m seemed more > stable in my limited testing. > Everyplace that uses uname probably > needs to be reviewed for a possible > re-work. BUILD_ARCH and its use is > an example. > > (format correction, this should have appeared as if said by Mark, but by myself) Yes, I have some places where I made MACHINE* related changes, and a wrapper script to enforce some things to be correct for the Linux-host--FreeBSD-target scenario. See this wrapper, for example: https://github.com/eddyp/freebsd/blob/linux-fixes/Linux.sh Eddy Petri=C8=99or
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK0XTWegCL58jDtMs2YMqcxZWGv16tOX-wbWdc=iLFLeuFctpQ>