From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 23:50:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A9A106566B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AF88FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0CNo2Fh076483 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0CNo2tV076482; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 GMT Message-Id: <200901122350.n0CNo2tV076482@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: kern/130478: [request] Port Linux kernel stub of nouveau to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/130478; it has been noted by GNATS. From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Henrik Friedrichsen Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/130478: [request] Port Linux kernel stub of nouveau to FreeBSD Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:42:02 -0600 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:03PM +0000, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > So is this a good or a bad thing? Are patches in development? Or why did > you suspend the PR? =) I know of no patches in development. Although we do allow requests for features to be submitted to GNATS, in practice they are hardly ever acted on. We have a sufficient backlog of things that you can technically consider "problem reports" to keep us busy for years :-) My own priorities are to bring attention to: - things that affect data integrity - regressions introduced in new versions - various bugs in the kernel - various bugs in userland There are a considerable backlog of the above (we have a lot more users than we do developers :-) ) What I consider secondary problems: - problems installing FreeBSD in the first place - non-supported devices We do have a team of bugbusters willing to help people with problems installing, which has helped to keep the count down to some degree. However, the 'requests' generally do not get handled -- it takes a developer wanting to solve a problem that affects him or her before things get committed. mcl