From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 00:10:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950BF16A41F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A6843D58 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB80A7Pd099013 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jB80A7ff099012; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:10:07 GMT Message-Id: <200512080010.jB80A7ff099012@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jung-uk Kim Cc: Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jung-uk Kim List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:10:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/89752; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jung-uk Kim To: Guy Harris Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:07:53 -0500 On Wednesday 07 December 2005 06:37 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I found another problem. BPF_MAXINSNS is tunable in FreeBSD and it > is not available to use for others. If we remove the check also, > there's no difference from the previous implementation. :-( The only usable change for FreeBSD was this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/bpf_filter.c.diff?r1=1.23&r2=1.24 Is this okay for you? Thanks, Jung-uk Kim