From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 31 00:34:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA08419 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA08414 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:34:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA14816; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:34:00 -0800 (PST) To: Peter Wemm cc: Mike Tancsa , rcramer@sytex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Final upgrades of tools in 2.2-STABLE (Re: Sendmail 8.9.1a ) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Dec 1998 14:54:07 +0800." <199812310654.OAA89915@spinner.netplex.com.au> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:34:00 -0800 Message-ID: <14812.915093240@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On the other, it messes up people tracking 2.2-stable just for minor bug > fixes and probably wouldn't appreciate arriving at work in the morning and > discovering they've now got to reconfigure sendmail and bind and that ipfw > now gives parameter size errors. For this reason, I'd prefer to avoid bind or anything else which requires intervention. Upgrading sendmail would be fine. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message