From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 13 05:57:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ABA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 05:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from annapolislinux.org (alinux.washcoll.edu [192.146.226.81])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC5743D4C
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 05:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tjk@annapolislinux.org)
Received: by annapolislinux.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8E4F7C00234; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:57:05 -0400
From: Theodore Knab <tjk@annapolislinux.org>
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040413125705.GA22952@annapolislinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Annapolis LUG
Subject: bridge with ipf or ipfw
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:57:06 -0000

I was wondering which firewall application works better
with bridged fire-walls. Currently, I have a basic familiarity with 
ipfw and ipf. 

-- 
------------------------------------------
Ted Knab
Chester, Maryland  21619 USA
------------------------------------------
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
                -- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown