From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Aug 8 15:00:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA17841 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 8 Aug 1996 15:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lserver.infoworld.com (lserver.infoworld.com [192.216.48.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA17830 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 1996 15:00:21 -0700 (PDT) From: BRETT_GLASS@ccgate.infoworld.com Received: from ccgate.infoworld.com by lserver.infoworld.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #12) id m0uodHK-000x1VC; Thu, 8 Aug 96 15:10 PDT Received: from ccMail by ccgate.infoworld.com (SMTPLINK V2.11) id AA839541459; Thu, 08 Aug 96 15:56:40 PST Date: Thu, 08 Aug 96 15:56:40 PST Message-Id: <9607088395.AA839541459@ccgate.infoworld.com> To: scott@statsci.com, mrm@mole.org Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org, terryl@ienet.com Subject: Re: IDE or SCSI if only one drive Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Your choice will depend upon whether you're looking for the cheapest possible drive of that capacity or the best performance per dollar spent. IDE is only cheap in dollars per megabyte; it'll cost you in slower performance and lost productivity.