From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 00:22:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D8516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8610443D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.146.189] (port=38375 helo=smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZHG4-0006IN-4x for freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:22:40 +0100 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:64771 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZHG3-0003QH-0S for freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:22:39 +0100 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:20:40 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-Face: :N, f2_*44g[tRY8Y-gL2zi`G|<6SpFjTeHt|V5LO6Yl2E7yAfEh{E6-8pqxUFX"l)=?utf-8?q?Nm8y=7E=0A=09IWJSAWQ=7D+=3DpP=7CT=5D?=@sy1sz%h)*CW6gtbp]"fe@MjICtIUo.0, CH~{[R4PXSyL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511080120.40866.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: To whom it concerns: kbtv-alpha3 uploaded X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:22:42 -0000 I think now sysctl settings are respected properly (even if set wrong, there's no way to verify if they are set right or if they even work as overrides) and added code to hopefully make the frequency scan detect properly if the upper most signal value should be taken as a valid station or not. Steve: I haven't looked into your sound problem much. Hope to be able to do that next, once this works. I'll go up to version alpha848 if I ahve to :) General new insight: channelset vs frequencies doesn't seem to be an issue at all. Sorry for the noise discussing this. Neither is the format/norm AFAICT. Thanks very much for testing and anyone who wants to try it out is very welcome to do so (at worst I may ask strange questions and for you to run strange commands ;-)! Sometimes it looks like nothing works but I have faith that in the end everything's going to work out alright. It's hard if you don't have the hardware nor the signal to test with and see how it behaves (and how it should be set up, both may be different every time every place). Thanks