From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 7 15:30:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA06360 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [129.72.251.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA06348 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 15:30:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA00844; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 16:30:36 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199804072230.QAA00844@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 16:30:33 -0600 To: "John S. Dyson" From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Where's FreeBSD? More of a disturbing trend Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199804072209.RAA00601@dyson.iquest.net> References: <199804072049.OAA29403@lariat.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 05:09 PM 4/7/98 -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: >It appears that [Andreessen] is a victim of the Linux religious advocacy engine. > >John Almost certainly true. While I despise flame wars, I think it might be time to revive the "Berkeley advocacy engine." People aren't even aware of what the GPL says, what the author's intent was, or that there are other (and, arguably, better) solutions. It'd also pay to point out the dramatically better stability and networking performance of FreeBSD relative to many Linux bundles. Marketing would help, but a little fanaticism wouldn't hurt. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message