From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 10 14: 2:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C45515333; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 14:02:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20923; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 23:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA02056; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 23:02:37 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 23:02:37 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Nate Williams Cc: committers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: People getting automatically unsub'ed from -arch Message-ID: <19991010230237.A777@bitbox.follo.net> References: <199910102057.OAA11530@mt.sri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <199910102057.OAA11530@mt.sri.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Mayhaps too many Cc:'s kept in order to reach relevant audience] On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 02:57:55PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > > I Can't believe this email only produced TWO responses! > > I would have thought that this wouldhav brought out the chainsaws! > > Maybe no-one is listenning on 'arch' any more, or maybe 'arch' doesn't > > work? (the only responders got it via 'core') > > Interesting. It appears that somehow I got 'unsubscribed' from arch. > Not sure why, but in May I was subscribed, but I'm no longer subscribed. > > Did everyone get unsubscribed when it went idle? Not *everybody*, at least - my subscription has kept. I do not know of any mass-unsubscription. Eivind, ex-moderator and now pseudo-moderator of -arch. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message