From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 21:11:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521031065671 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbrabez@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24FA8FC2B for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbrabez@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so759297hsc.11 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=G9ZNGdYW7ce7Cd/mQ8hITnpOEpMbLZEpN7NOAkcDcF8=; b=OhhlykHGabzB+DJ4Uj2iKyMigNJZeelMGp+HMBh3CPO6h9Prj8UnJs8Vrxfu/8CCbu/i/Ii2q1a6tTyc6FVhzriP8iZXZ02bg8OY4X5/IhVzPHMy3H/Aar+PREbMQ32iQT0hfonN7sLais4wNqBPwnAYb6efp+kD1ADwRGcy6ng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=us/jOoNJem+yojb6iscQiwk2wW9ixGiDSoBbsM1gPUxATf1ujJqDED/yQa2I/LN8PlIckKTnvj36y78OgpcMS2ceD5c96vbYTIc5LqHiw8vmTfyk37YopIv3iK9aoT9kqC/MxdDRtPONPrZV2jSJNySvIoAyFNvOCqIDmKcxfHw= Received: by 10.100.201.16 with SMTP id y16mr7682054anf.26.1207516315140; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.31.2 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3456f9ca0804061411n4d749521p1b1a29d2db7720e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:11:55 +0200 From: "Sofian Brabez" To: "Alexander Leidinger" In-Reply-To: <20080404103637.21420xu11y89zdms@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080403202620.GG48868@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <3456f9ca0804032011i7db909d4qc34ff53bd6f7aa28@mail.gmail.com> <20080404103637.21420xu11y89zdms@webmail.leidinger.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is describing sysctl variables useful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:11:56 -0000 On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Unfortunately this is not suitable for the SoC. Google wants code > contributions, not pure documentation work. Maybe you can find something > else you would be willing to do during the SoC. In case you haven't send > multiple applications, feel free to send more than one. > > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > Goldfish... what stupid animals. Even Wayne Cody stops > eating before he bursts. > > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 > http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 > According with my submit proposal, it's not just concern a "pure" documentation, but sysctl improvements. As Ivan said it, the sysctl description are hardcoded in kernel source in C. That's why, during this summer i would dive into sysctl(3) C architecture composed by OID, MIB, tree and node sysctls to complete description, do code cleanup and fix some bugs identified by XXX/TODO and new pr. Moreover, i have proposed another little hack around lib fetch(3) to be busy during all summer code period. Finally, i've got enough time, i would take to ports some security applications (fuzzing, proxy) in port tree. I explain with more details my project on Google Web Application, the summary is "sysctl improvements and python binding of FreeBSD libfetch library". With this complementary informations, do you think this project it's not suitable for Google summer code this year ? Best Regards. -- sbz