From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 26 06:43:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BC5BA51E0 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7B71885 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E40ED8FFD for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/E40ED8FFD; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Updating to 11.0-BETA2 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <73b2ef58-ba95-86dc-fea7-f83887a17e71@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:43:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wIPnikcnDE3Hf0tiOTU6VAcDoe1TSRQ5E" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:43:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wIPnikcnDE3Hf0tiOTU6VAcDoe1TSRQ5E Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PIe7K1S3ehTO8axKXx9wRa3PHkBiUbKiJ" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <73b2ef58-ba95-86dc-fea7-f83887a17e71@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Updating to 11.0-BETA2 References: In-Reply-To: --PIe7K1S3ehTO8axKXx9wRa3PHkBiUbKiJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/07/2016 22:00, Doug Hardie wrote: > I installed the patches for freebsd-update today on a number of systems= =2E The one system running 11.0-BETA1 then was able to upgrade to BETA2 = with no problems. However, none of the 9.3 systems would upgrade. This = is what happened on each of them: >=20 > mail# uname -a > FreeBSD mail 9.3-RELEASE-p43 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p43 #0: Sat May 28 00:= 19:32 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sy= s/GENERIC amd64 > mail# freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.0-BETA2 > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 9.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org...= done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Inspecting system... done. >=20 > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > kernel/generic world/base >=20 > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > world/doc world/games world/lib32 >=20 > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y >=20 > Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-BETA2 from update6.freebsd.org... = done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >=20 > The update metadata is correctly signed, but > failed an integrity check. > Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. Given you have applied the fixes in the EN, this should just work. Can you raise a problem report in Bugzilla about this please? Cheers, Matthew --PIe7K1S3ehTO8axKXx9wRa3PHkBiUbKiJ-- --wIPnikcnDE3Hf0tiOTU6VAcDoe1TSRQ5E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXlwaPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATNHAP/0g0rAumsGPFrF2TCbIUvgPR NMQE5VHAtYa31tTuEVCBwP3hXoLax4PWTvun7RfWe2fTJnVDwEp0u5WsEx/z9E9T eouHXJxtlT66lgBTUHMfeN8eiv8s9N4sE/o7uCVkiDYtQyBvHg/kWk+OQiNnYQao /+N5GiDEING/sTd7d9bMOhdYIHACP9F4x+TlfG8YqiwXeZtlOAO2iOGDyf0vdqBS lMOkeJlrvcjspADmtoRXL7wQyO5y8viiz9scyuc+HXt6udTupLwD3GhPg+sHXL0z 5jmW2HhSozu/F3S002ozG9nN+I4PZO/fLeAGfumv+VFbu4y0IUZOgKdWqLAz7xCN NCBI4FZNjzZlKBh7Hozfq7mY2ELcwr9PtFug/Oo0qTkgiIPcbIoOTJQpahHJ/QrL LuQ7Cgd/Li5gN2sMdJEXPdticR9M/JzlMWZBz7gRCU68+oAVol9ml6QIKoIEB7/q 5Xlt/WaoV3MOVPGTUqb/Y27QSsxz6xK9bBSg0QGdjkz/W4z+j2QNttTaJH5gDmqc P/37vShjQ0lPeoHit/DYVtKab2mFuMorTCMVKU4ogyDDEEX2Tb1nHeZ3qVT5TYA3 Dplu1/jWrOOkXI5mABXxDwhYrxQVSategjW6ba7pfcmqJSbZTS4nhYsvqMGvR4IS zHHn5aXCTlBTOYTC5aQ5 =xawg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wIPnikcnDE3Hf0tiOTU6VAcDoe1TSRQ5E--