From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 22:48:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E87116A402; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3416F13C46E; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l35Mm2B0084947; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:48:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <46157C97.8000004@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:47:51 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Julian H. Stacey" References: <20070405103708.GC842@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200704052218.l35MIVa3092418@fire.jhs.private> In-Reply-To: <200704052218.l35MIVa3092418@fire.jhs.private> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:48:03 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: FreeBSD Current , imp@freebsd.org, piso@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we need this junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:48:09 -0000 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > imp@freebsd.org, piso@freebsd.org > cc: FreeBSD Current > > I have an (EISA ?) 1742A if any developer needs it for bug chasing. > It's a full length card. Maybe it exhibits same problems as a 1542A ? > I found it while looking to offer my old 1542A, re below > The 1742 and 1542 use completely different chips, IIRC. In any case, Warner is exactly correct that the 1542A was an early rev with unique problems and that it's not representative of the 1542B or C revs. Jeez, how much traffic is the original idiot poster going to make us waste? Scott