From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 13:25:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE24540 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7D923A for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercury.ph.man.ac.uk [130.88.75.175:63704] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with PLAIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id r1LDP4mN005063 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:25:05 +0400 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: how to use -f[no-]color-diagnostics clang option with ports Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:25:52 +0000 Message-ID: <12378284.0P1MznmmVU@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.9.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201302211249.r1LCnU53052785@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201302211249.r1LCnU53052785@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:25:09 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:49:30 +0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > clang colours corrupt script() output, e.g.: > > #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. \ > ^[[0;1;32m ^ > ^[[0m1 warning generated. > ^[[31m^[[1mLinking CXX executable ../../../bin/pvbatch > ^[[0m[ 91%] Built target pvbatch-real > > Can I use something like this > > CFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics > CXXFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics > > to suppress colour? CMAKE_ARGS+= -DCMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE=off Max From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 15:49:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DBEF63 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67794F2C for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-134-3-231-194.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [134.3.231.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9509685FBC; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:49:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51264219.2020409@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:49:45 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: libreoffice References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:54 -0000 On 18/02/2013 12:46, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > package works great (and far faster than openoffice) but still i would find quickstarter functionality that is available in windows openoffice useful. You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is just the same time it made your system start take longer. Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations start to feel sluggish after some time. They are a plague, binding resources before it's even clear that they're needed. Why MS accepted this practice from software vendors is beyond me. They accept that their system looks bad on behalf of making the software it runs look good, without any real benefit to the user. It's just about shifting blame. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?