From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 21 16:08:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA16840 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:08:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA16835 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:07:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA48177; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:07:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:07:51 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199812220007.QAA48177@apollo.backplane.com> To: Eivind Eklund Cc: Cliff Skolnick , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.conf References: <19981221163532.G14124@follo.net> <000201be2d2c$0b94baa0$2020a8c0@icarus.internal.steam.com> <19981222000242.H14124@follo.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org :On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 01:51:20PM -0800, Cliff Skolnick wrote: :> This sandbox stuff is starting to worry me :( :> :> The more FreeBSD changes stock daemons used on many other UNIX systems the :> harder it will be to respond to know bugs. For denial of service attacks :... :> The sandbox changes a fundamental design of UNIX, and makes FreeBSD :> "different" than other UNIX systems. The difference in the short term may :... Two points. (1) We have made no changes to the stock bind distribution. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada. (2) Using a sandbox does not change the fundamental design of UNIX in the least, in my view. A number of traditional UNIX subsystems have used sandboxes for a long time. For example, the 'operator' account and lpd. -Matt Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications & God knows what else. (Please include original email in any response) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message