From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 6 21:33:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA18758 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18712 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id QAA27019 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (herring.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.2]) by nlsystems.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA10940; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 00:08:27 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 00:08:27 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: proff@suburbia.net cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter compilation In-Reply-To: <19970406152402.7205.qmail@suburbia.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 7 Apr 1997 proff@suburbia.net wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Apr 1997 proff@suburbia.net wrote: > > > > > > Anyone object to src/sys_contrib then? In cases like ipfilter it > > > would still contain user-land kernel support code, but this would > > > be quite reasonable size-wise compared to src/contrib. > > > > I would prefer src/sys/contrib. > > > > -- > > Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com > > The problem with this is that packages in src/sys/contrib/* may have > non-BSD copyrights -- but because it is under sys, you don't have any > choice in the matter. I thought about this but it didn't seem to be a problem since there is a mix of GNU and BSD copyrights in the src/contrib tree already. Having a similar mix in the src/sys/contrib tree would be OK. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891