From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 23:28:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BA216A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:28:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pckizer@nostrum.com) Received: from nostrum.com (magus.nostrum.com [69.5.195.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ED943D46; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:28:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pckizer@nostrum.com) Received: from [165.91.250.64] (magus.tamu.edu [165.91.250.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAANS4ao094624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:28:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from pckizer@nostrum.com) In-Reply-To: <20051110154950.Q68007@fledge.watson.org> References: <200510191623.j9JGNSfr007356@magus.nostrum.com> <20051019175020.S60849@fledge.watson.org> <20051025110453.L6720@fledge.watson.org> <2E18CEAE-2A72-4387-B92E-DAED7CC7FACD@nostrum.com> <33E53AA7-2A01-4BBE-9674-8F54E008D0A8@nostrum.com> <0906B09C-B5A2-402E-BF39-57EBB20B2D4F@nostrum.com> <425C901E-3315-41EC-B2D9-C372A2110FF0@nostrum.com> <20051109184311.Y85371@fledge.watson.org> <20051110154950.Q68007@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <13D42742-8D19-4FD0-8249-64A64C55A5D8@nostrum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Philip Kizer Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:28:03 -0600 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 165.91.250.64 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Cc: Robert Watson Subject: Re: Problem remains with FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE as seen in RELENG_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:28:06 -0000 On Nov 10, 2005, at 09:54, Robert Watson wrote: > Last night I successfully sent this patch to the wrong person, as > I'm chasing a number of different bugs currently. While it won't > help with his quota-related problems, using a combination of > patches (attached) I'm now able to run a set of file descriptor > passing edge case regression tests successfully. I've committed > the regression test to src/tools/regression/sockets/unix_passfd. > This test should only be run once the patches are applied, needless > to say. *chuckle* No worries... > If you could try out the patches and let me know if things improve, > that would be great. Patches applied and running now. You can be sure I'll let you know as soon as I have new info (although if your first go is all good, for my production situation, it's the old "proving a negative" problem and we'll be good if I hit my personal timeout next week and mail you back to say I haven't seen a repeat). Thanks! Philip