From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 16 03:32:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61ED16A417 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:32:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5FCE43D49 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:32:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 21419 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2006 03:32:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 16 Sep 2006 03:32:42 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:33:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral In-Reply-To: <20060915145120.GA93074@registro.br> Message-ID: <20060915223211.R65248@odysseus.silby.com> References: <2a41acea0608301145j7bbed961j33ce903a27d8963d@mail.gmail.com> <20060904130827.GE12975@registro.br> <20060911195521.GD63300@registro.br> <20060913182019.R50147@fledge.watson.org> <20060913182457.W50147@fledge.watson.org> <20060914175049.GH49126@registro.br> <450A2A6E.3040408@yandex.ru> <20060915145120.GA93074@registro.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" , Robert Watson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS query performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:32:45 -0000 Although it sounds silly, could you try recompiling 6.1 and 7.0 with a non-SMP kernel and see how they perform? That would at least tell us if it's a general performance problem in 6.x and 7.x, or if SMP is somehow hurting performance in this case. Mike "Silby" Silbersack