From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 21:23:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF16716A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 21:23:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E6B43D4C for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 21:23:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) iB3LNmEr037039; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:23:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iB3LNlaD037038; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:23:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:23:47 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Will Saxon Message-ID: <20041203212347.GA36895@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED803A2D3A8@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED803A2D3A8@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-sun-jdk15 or jdk15 on 5.3R-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:23:51 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:22:16PM -0500, Will Saxon wrote: > I am another user who is not able to get linux-sun-jdk15 > working on a 5.3-R machine. Truss shows: > ... > > Is there a timetable on native support for 1.5 or fixture of the > linux-sun-jdk15 port? For the native support, we don't issue timetables due to the voluntary nature of the project. In terms of the linux version, I've had a report of the Linux version working on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT, but haven't heard of anything else. At the very least it looks like another syscall needs to be implemented in the Linux emulation layer. > Should someone mark the port as broken or remove it? It sounds like > it does not work on 4.x or 5.x at all. It was just marked as IGNORE. BROKEN is probably better though. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org