From owner-freebsd-doc  Tue Jan  5 18:33:22 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27331
          for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:33:22 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA27324
          for <doc@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:33:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA73441;
	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:32:26 -0800 (PST)
To: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au>
cc: conrads@neosoft.com, doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Kernel configuration docs a neglected area? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jan 1999 08:46:18 +1100."
             <19990106084618.64906@welearn.com.au> 
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 18:32:26 -0800
Message-ID: <73437.915589946@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Does this seem worthwhile or not?

Not really, unfortunately, because LINT is merely a kernel
configuration file which grew into a (poor) documentation mechanism.

Rather than further warping it out of shape, especially given that
config(8) and all its associated files will eventually go away,
we should be working on a section of the Handbook which covers this
in more detail.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message