From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 13 11:26:31 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA12240 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:26:31 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA12227 for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:26:29 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA13557; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:26:09 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199502131926.LAA13557@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Network gurus: How hard to split bandwidth across modems?
To: ugen@netvision.net.il (Ugen J.S.Antsilevich)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jcargill@cs.wisc.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, nate@trout.sri.MT.net
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.950213205817.ugen@ugen.NetManage.co.il> from "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" at Feb 13, 95 08:56:36 pm
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 494       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmm...let's say we have ppp0 and ppp1 both 28.8 to some lae where
> we have another box 28.8...
> Can't we define on our box 
> route add default <ppp0-IP>
> 
> and on the box on the second side:
> route add <our box IP> <ppp1-IP-point on second box>
> 
> Wouldn't this one work?

Yes it would but you'd get two half-duplex lines, not what we want...


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk>
TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.