From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 14:57:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6A337B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DBC943FA3 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 13319 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Jul 2003 21:57:45 -0000 Received: from cvpn014.gwdg.de (EHLO gmx.net) (134.76.22.14) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 09 Jul 2003 23:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <3F0C8FF5.5040602@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 23:58:13 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kabaev References: <20030709173528.5db2dc02.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <20030709173528.5db2dc02.ak03@gte.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Julian Elischer cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The upcoming GCC 3.3+ upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:57:50 -0000 Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) > Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>p.s. this does not mean that I do not appreciate the work you are >>doing to keep our compiler up to date.. Keep up the good work. >> > > > Julian, > > there was nothing in your question that could possibly offend me. I do > not take comments about GCC suckage personally. Yes, GCC 3.3 compilation > speed is likely to suffer a bit compared to 3.2, although the change > should be pretty minimal. There are examples where GCC 3.3 even beats > 3.2 in compilation speed, but I would not keep much hope :) C is tad bit slower. C++ is generally faster. Compared with the speed of other compilers GCC is still simply ridiculous. > The GCC folks have started to take compilation speed seriously in 3.4 > branch, we'll see if changed attitude will make a difference in their > next major release. > > For now I am pretty happy that a newer compiler did not overflow boot2 > block. This is nice compared with a stable trend demonstrated by _all_ > previous releases.