From owner-cvs-etc  Wed Jun  4 17:33:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-etc>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA17272
          for cvs-etc-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA17245;
          Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA09998; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ache@nagual.pp.ru, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jun 1997 10:02:11 +1000."
             <199706050002.KAA23320@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 17:33:22 -0700
Message-ID: <9994.865470802@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >I'd like to argue for the introduction of SHARED=copies as the
> >hard-wired behavior.  If we're ever to create a more compartmentalized
> >system, as everyone is ranting for, then we need to decouple things
> >like "bin" and "src".
> 
> First decouple building src from /usr/include.

That would be nice, but that still doesn't stop me from building
/usr/include as copies and not symlinks right now. :-)

Asking for Rome before removing any of the rubble surrounding it is
unrealistic.  I agree that what you request should be done, but
not as a prerequisite.

					Jordan