Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:26:52 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comments for a pmake newb Message-ID: <20141110062652.GT66862@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <86a93zpzz6.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> References: <86a93zpzz6.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I'm porting a program that uses a simple GNU make file, but I'm thinking > about replacing the make file to remove the devel/gmake dependency. I > don't foresee many upstream changes that will make this an issue. Is > this a bad/good idea? If the Makefile is pretty static and not changing much, one can do that. But as upstream will probably never integrate that change, what's the point ? Is the devel/gmake dependency that 'bad' ? This probably depends on the application being ported, so: What do you port ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141110062652.GT66862>