From owner-freebsd-isdn Mon Mar 2 04:06:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA00196 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 04:06:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arg1.demon.co.uk (arg1.demon.co.uk [194.222.34.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA00190 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 04:06:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from arg@arg1.demon.co.uk) Received: (from arg@localhost) by arg1.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA24877; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 12:11:54 GMT Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 12:11:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Andrew Gordon X-Sender: arg@server.arg.sj.co.uk To: Wolfgang Helbig cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Teles IRQ 9 (was:Re: AVM A1 Setup bug on NetBSD?) In-Reply-To: <199803021119.MAA00216@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Wolfgang Helbig wrote: > Give IRQ 5 a try. > Couple days ago someone tried to use IRQ 15 (!). Did work with Win95, did > not work with BISDN. Then he configured IRQ 5 and success! (Don't remember > the card though) > > On another system with TELES 16.3 IRQ 9 doesn't (BISDN and I4B) work, > whereas IRQ 5 worked with both packages. Perhaps the card config latch needs 0x02 rather than 0x09 to select IRQ9? (just guessing; the hard drive just died on my test machine while I was installing I4B, so I can't test it right now). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message