From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 8 17:16:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from elwood.cais.com (elwood.cais.com [199.0.216.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FB37B672 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:16:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ron@bigslacker.com) Received: from proxy.delron-corp.com ([209.8.126.130]) by elwood.cais.com (8.9.1/Elwood) with ESMTP id UAA20727 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:07:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ron@localhost) by proxy.delron-corp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA04917 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:14:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ron@bigslacker.com) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:14:26 -0500 (EST) From: Ron Pritchett X-Sender: ron@proxy.delron-corp.com To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Kerberos 5 in 4.0? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have been searching through deja.com for over a week now and I can't find an answer to this question. I was wondering if 4.0 comes with kerberos 5 built-in? Or do I just use the kr5 port? Does it have a PAM? I want to use k5 and a PAM for k5 logins. I know this is "doable" with k4, but I keep seeing comments about how bad k4 is compared to k5. The sticking point seems to be the PAM. I've not seen a k5 PAM for FBSD. thanks, Ron++ PS. No flames please. I'm new to the mailing list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message