From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 06:53:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CE616A41F for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:53:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58043D46 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:53:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8K6qgDk042931; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:53:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <432FB1B0.3060404@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:52:32 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050823 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vittorio References: <3360624.1126887229256.JavaMail.root@pswm4.cp.tin.it> <432AF27E.10804@ashleymoran.me.uk> <200509200826.35867.vdemart1@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200509200826.35867.vdemart1@tin.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating freebsd without cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:53:49 -0000 vittorio wrote: > >Well, after thourough examination and a word with the network administrator I >learnt that my FreeBSD 5.4 client cannot resolve the name (and the IP too) of >portsnap.daemonology.net because it is behind a firewall and a proxy (which >-by the way - I had already defined via both $HTTP_PROXY and $http_proxy; as >I stated in so doing "make install" under a port works flawlessly downloading >whatever is needed!). >According to the admin (windows 2000 network) portsnap is not able to use the >name resolution of the proxy as other programs like browsers can and relies >on the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf only. >Any idea for this poor newbie? >Ciao >Vittorio > > $ echo "72.21.59.250 portsnap.daemonology.net" >> /etc/hosts ---maybe?? I doubt Colin will move it anytime soon (but I've been wrong many times before...) HTH, Kevin Kinsey