Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:52:33 +0400
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.local.dist BSD.usr.dist
Message-ID:  <20040330155233.GA71146@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200403301533.i2UFXDhZ030459@green.homeunix.org>
References:  <20040330142213.GA52230@nagual.pp.ru> <200403301533.i2UFXDhZ030459@green.homeunix.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:33:13AM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> I did not see an explanation.  I saw that the mtree could fail but not why

See recent discussion in current@

> correctly documenting and enforcing these links in the etc/mtree CANNOT be 
> the wrong thing!

The situation is not so easy, it depends on which mtree mode you use (-P
or -L). I'll try to be short. Imagine, say, you have /var/mail linked to
/disk1/mail. To enforce correct permissions on /disk1/mail you need to use

MTREE_FOLLOWS_SYMLINKS= -L

in your /etc/make.conf (or set it in the env. etc). At least in the past 
some ports try to change /var/mail permission, so it is real life example.

But, once you use -L, all symlinks in the BSD.*.dist becomes 
just directories and mtree will reports mismatch.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330155233.GA71146>