Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:35:33 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, re@FreeBSD.org Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... Message-ID: <8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040811171300.N54010@ync.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >> * Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> [040811 09:24] wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: >>>> eik 2004-08-11 16:16:24 UTC >>>> >>>> >>>> - replace the perl version of pkg_version(1) by its C equivalent, >>>> which means that `pkg_version -c' does no longer work >>> >>> I don't think that this should have gone into RELENG_4, in this case. >> >> Agreed. We don't break things that used to work in 4.x unless there >> is dire need. > > Also agreed. This should not have happened, and I'd like to see it > backed out. Before I get a million replies to this commit: When anyone from re@ thinks it is worth the effort, I will add an -c option to the C pkg_version code ASAP. I believe backing this out won't be beneficial for -STABLE users, since they'll loose a lot of features (and speed). Has anyone on this thread *ever* used that option? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914>