From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 11 11:48: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hokkshideh.jetcafe.org (hokkshideh.jetcafe.org [205.147.43.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE3437BAA5 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:47:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from hokkshideh.jetcafe.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hokkshideh.jetcafe.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA06572; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006111847.LAA06572@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Kelly Yancey Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What, exactly, does this mean? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:47:43 -0700 From: Dave Hayes Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kelly Yancey writes: > If you up PMAP_SHPGPERPROC, you increase the number of > pv_entries created at boot time. However, I am not informed enough > to say how high you can safely increase PMAP_SHPGPERPROC. What is the upper bound related to? What are the dangers in increasing it too much? ------ Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< "What's so special about the Net? People -still- don't listen..." -The Unknown Drummer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message