From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 22:28:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4912A7614D for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "alchemy.franken.de", Issuer "alchemy.franken.de" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815821DAB for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTPS id u11MRu2M037607 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:27:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u11MRu9b037606; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:27:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:27:56 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Mike Tancsa Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: possible em regression (was Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap) Message-ID: <20160201222756.GE15359@alchemy.franken.de> References: <201601272231.u0RMV8LW019394@repo.freebsd.org> <56ABAA92.5050901@sentex.net> <56ABB291.5040305@omnilan.de> <56ABCE95.3030807@sentex.net> <20160130012358.GY15359@alchemy.franken.de> <56ACE917.80502@sentex.net> <20160130172618.GA15359@alchemy.franken.de> <56AFD811.1030706@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AFD811.1030706@sentex.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (alchemy.franken.de [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:27:57 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:28:01 -0000 On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with > > the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the > > box? > > > Hi, > The patch does not apply cleanly Hrm, it does here on stable/10. If your checkout is unaltered, the only thing I can think of is that the patch got corrupted when sent by e-mail. I've put it online: https://people.freebsd.org/~marius/em_tso_gig_only_10.diff marius@alchemy:/home/marius/co/10/src/sys/dev/e1000 > svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/home/marius/co/10/src URL: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/sys/dev/e1000 Relative URL: ^/stable/10/sys/dev/e1000 Repository Root: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 295130 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: marius Last Changed Rev: 294958 Last Changed Date: 2016-01-27 23:31:08 +0100 (Wed, 27 Jan 2016) marius@alchemy:/home/marius/co/10/src/sys/dev/e1000 > patch < ~/em_tso_gig_only_10.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c |=================================================================== |--- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 294962) |+++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file if_em.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1377. done