From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 16:50:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212016A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:50:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A15343D1D for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) iA2GoMbo024202; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:50:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)iA2GoMJN024199; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:50:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:50:22 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Emanuel Strobl In-Reply-To: <200411021355.58139.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20041102113112.F23546@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <20041102124750.77588.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> <200411021355.58139.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: asymmetric NFS transfer rates X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:50:24 -0000 On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. November 2004 13:47 schrieb Claus Guttesen: >>> problems, but I'm wondering why I >>> can't write to my 5.3-stable NFS server more that >>> 3,5MB/s while reading gives >>> me 9,5MB/s? >> >> Are you using IDE- or SCSI-disks? Reading is faster >> than writing on IDE. > > Like I wrote, the server writes more than 35MB/s onto the RAID5 array. Last > time I saw a hard drive which has problems with 10MB/s was 6 years ago, no > matter of IDE or SCSI. You are going by the assumption that the benchmarks are run using transfers of a single, contiguous, abnormally huge file. In the real world, things aren't that peachy. Remember to factor in things such as seek times, drive response latency, driver locking and contention on Giant (This is a SCSI RAID card, isn't it?), among other things... Regards, Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >