From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 13 13:50:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284014CC6 for ; Thu, 13 May 1999 13:50:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA10363; Thu, 13 May 1999 14:50:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA07674; Thu, 13 May 1999 14:50:10 -0600 Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 14:50:10 -0600 Message-Id: <199905132050.OAA07674@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Moschuk Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 1.85 --> 2.0 In-Reply-To: <19990513164720.A26399@trinsec.com> References: <19990513164720.A26399@trinsec.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Out of curiosity, is there a reason we are still using Berkeley DB v1.85 as > apposed to v2? The new copyright is 'less free'. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message