From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu Jan 23 09:12:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA29912
          for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:12:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.serv.net (mx.serv.net [199.201.191.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29907;
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost by mx.serv.net
	(8.7.5/SERV Revision: 2.30) id JAA22511; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:11:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush <sjkb@abstractsoft.com>
To: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 56K vs X2?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.93.970123011629.27756N-100000@sidhe.memra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970123091105.1977G-100000@mx.serv.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, Michael Dillon wrote:
> In fact, in some recent field trials USR had difficulty getting
> faster than 53K out of their X2 modems. 

In a flyer we got yesterday from USR, it stated that "due to current FCC
restrictions" connections will only be 53K but _could_ be 56K.  

	    Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush  ServNet/Abstract Software
	 sjkb@abstractsoft.com   http://www.serv.net/~begonia
	 ``Just another one of the flock following the herd.''