From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  9 16:57:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AD00D37B401; Fri,  9 May 2003 16:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com
	[65.86.180.18])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 36AD543FAF; Fri,  9 May 2003 16:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from root@builder.freebsdmall.com)
Received: by builder.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 2DCBE1306; Fri,  9 May 2003 16:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 16:57:55 -0700
From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030509235755.GF385@freebsdmall.com>
References: <20030509222603.GA11907@intruder.bmah.org>
	<3EBC2BD7.5050300@btc.adaptec.com> <20030509224328.GB12009@intruder.bmah.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030509224328.GB12009@intruder.bmah.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B  3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D
cc: hubs@freebsd.org
cc: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
cc: re@freebsd.org
cc: "Long, Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com>
Subject: Re: 5.1-BETA ia32 bits uploaded
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp <freebsd-hubs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 23:57:57 -0000

On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:43:28PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> Hmmm.  When I asked, I was told that pc98 could use i386 packages, but
> for 5.0 we never did a package split for that platform.  I have no idea
> if just dropping a normal i386 package split onto the pc98 CDROM
> staging area would Just Work (TM), or if it's desirable.

Yes that should just work, but is probably not all that useful since
our normal split doesn't include many ja-* ports and the various build
knobs wouldn't be tweaked on bento to include Japanese localized
settings for other large ports.

	 - Murray