From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 21 16:26:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5410151BE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:26:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA61027 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <376ECA12.FF6D5DF@whistle.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:26:10 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NFS Test patch.. Anyone tested it? References: <199906150421.VAA14439@apollo.backplane.com> <199906160330.UAA25113@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > > Here's the location: > > http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ > > It's in the 'NFS bugs first found by David E. Cross' section. > I've looked it over a bit and can't see any major problems.. and it definitly does fix some problems.. Has anyone tried it in a heavy server environment? if so, any problems? It's running ok here but it's only very lightly tested in our environment. I'd like to get it checked in if it really is an improvement.... julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message