From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 03:01:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A8F16A41F; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 03:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A76943D45; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 03:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a212.otenet.gr [212.205.215.212]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j7N31Knn026453; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:01:21 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7N31JkW007126; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:01:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7N31JVX007125; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:01:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:01:18 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tim Robbins Message-ID: <20050823030118.GB7028@gothmog.gr> References: <20050822213028.GB4812@garage.freebsd.pl> <430A8F1A.6090607@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <430A8F1A.6090607@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-arch Subject: Re: New library: libpidfile. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 03:01:24 -0000 On 2005-08-23 12:51, Tim Robbins wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >I'd like to commit a small library for handling "pidfiles". > > This sounds like a good idea to me, but you might consider putting the > functionality in libutil instead of creating a separate library. Hmmm, not that you mention libutil, I was only yesterday thinking that it's a bit annoying that "man libutil" doesn't bring up a useful manpage. Are there any objections to making a manpage that doesn't include *all* the details for the libutil functions but just pointers to the functions it currently implements? This is slightly different from, say, editline(3). This is why I'm asking.