From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Mar 25 8:54:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B237B82E for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 08:54:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from argon.blackdawn.com ([209.69.196.116]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA82381; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 08:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A8901A1A; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 11:53:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 11:53:46 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: vns@delta.odessa.ua, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs and vmware Message-ID: <20000325115346.H391@argon.blackdawn.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:15:34PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:15:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Now that linprocfs is in the tree (in both 4.0 and 5.0), there's no > need for fakeprocfs.sh and ${PREFIX}/bin/vmware can be a simple > symlink to ${PREFIX}/lib/vmware/bin/vmware. Ok, but not everyone will have an updated RELENG_4,HEAD if they try to install VMWARE.. how do you think that should be handled? :-) IMHO, a simple message in pkg/MESSAGE should suffice, as typical users shouldn't be installing something like vmware anyway.. Thanks for your work, DES! -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message