Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:32:08 +0000 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf src/libexec Makefile Message-ID: <200211130932.08532.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20021113102346.A6438@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200211121731.gACHVCMX099693@repoman.freebsd.org> <200211130916.38733.dfr@nlsystems.com> <20021113102346.A6438@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 9:23 am, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:16:38AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 November 2002 5:31 pm, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > obrien 2002/11/12 09:31:12 PST > > > > > > Modified files: > > > etc inetd.conf > > > libexec Makefile > > > Log: > > > [DAIVD O'BRIEN's OPINION] > > > Head off what I think is an abuse of the TRB, and disable > > > lukemftpd. > > > > The TRB has nothing to do with the fate of lukemftpd and we have > > not been discussing it. Policy decisions (which ftpd to use, which > > rwatson suggested het wanted to ask the TRB I missed that. > > > authentication framework to use) are probably not part of the TRB's > > Why not? Which ftpd to use isn't a technical decision. Presumably both versions=20 work (for some value of the word 'work'). Which authentication=20 framework to use is clear: we use PAM for authentication services. What=20 is left? > <sjeez, why is this ftpd thing so hairy??> Because its so trivial that everyone can have an opinion on it of=20 course. --=20 Doug Rabson=09=09=09=09Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com =09=09=09=09=09Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211130932.08532.dfr>