From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 00:36:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8711065FFA for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+ZO=5c498b99@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DB38FC14 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+ZO=5c498b99@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E8F164DA9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:21:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A7C23E3FB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:21:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 01:21:38 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080904012138.4ff77804@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080904004712.R1670@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <57057966651240527470195062000340979511-Webmail2@me.com> <26682.8228872784$1220442858@news.gmane.org> <20080903135750.F2188@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080903151335.0454e929@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080904004712.R1670@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Google Chrome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:36:57 -0000 On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to > > me. > > except it leads to google-everything. not even a bit better than > microsoft-everything There's a lot of difference. Microsoft has always tried to undermine standards because standards give its competitors a more level-playing field, which is what Google needs for its webapps to compete with Microsoft's desktop applications. I don't see how that's bad for anyone except Microsoft.