From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 15:20:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9172C16A4CF
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:20:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web51608.mail.yahoo.com (web51608.mail.yahoo.com
	[206.190.38.213])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 058EE43D4C
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:20:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com)
Received: (qmail 32580 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jan 2005 15:20:35 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
	b=b3YdcZ1JZ4WT/M95nA0cMH66Zp82y9T1IzfP67ZLsHaBvA5ncjRgI8YJ8EKEPPm6ORw3CzuX7/a6f2fS5nsW63FsMh+xeXpOfEF6xUT9ollo5CZwiux5wLD+MdgXag3UibsnNSz1uM20T5o/+gy93QKdFvmM4uvfqEh3Wdu97BE=
	;
Message-ID: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.119.73.115] by web51608.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:20:35 PST
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:20:35 -0800 (PST)
From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com>
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: bremner@unb.ca
cc: jan.lentfer@web.de
cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: repocopy lam7 --> lam
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:20:36 -0000

Hi;

According to lam's website:

"LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot of
changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for
download only because some vendors still require it."

They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users.

I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to
lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of either
so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are
objections to this.

best regards,

    Pedro.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com