From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 25 22:03:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F174416A4CE
	for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:03:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from april.chuckr.org (april.chuckr.org [66.92.151.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD99643D53
	for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:03:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org)
Received: from [66.92.151.195] (july.chuckr.org [66.92.151.195])
	by april.chuckr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813D3118CB
	for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:01:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <42448A1A.5070802@chuckr.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:00:58 +0000
From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050316)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: eclipse for amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:03:04 -0000

I wanted to build eclipse, now that I finally have a native jdk15 
working for my amd64, but I am chagined to find that the port is listed 
as being for ARCH i386 only.  Anyone know if this is a case of there 
being a real tesstable architectural problem, or if it's merely a fact 
of lack of amd64 testing?

Which I would supply gladly.