From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 01:20:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC3216A41F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C485043D80 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:20:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB81K7ce010921 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:20:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jB81K7lO010920; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:20:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:20:07 GMT Message-Id: <200512080120.jB81K7lO010920@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Guy Harris Cc: Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Guy Harris List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:20:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/89752; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Guy Harris To: Jung-uk Kim Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:15:28 -0800 On Dec 7, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I found another problem. BPF_MAXINSNS is tunable in FreeBSD and it is > not available to use for others. If we remove the check also, > there's no difference from the previous implementation. :-( What about the change to ensure that it checks both BPF_LD *and* BPF_LDX, and both BPF_ST *and* BPF_STX?