Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:31:43 +0100
From:      Snoop <snoop@email.it>
To:        Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???
Message-ID:  <1331915503.4898.16.camel@urano.inhio.eu>
In-Reply-To: <4F631FB6.4060303@my.gd>
References:  <1331838392.1453.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <9D882CD7-5BD1-4A49-86AB-DD8A5B86D4EC@my.gd> <1331893099.4898.10.camel@urano.inhio.eu> <4F631FB6.4060303@my.gd>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's the STP configuration on my two switch ports:

 spanning-tree portfast
 spanning-tree bpduguard enable



On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:10 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> You're not looking for FEC or ethechannel or 802.3ad at all.
> 
> What you're looking for, in the case of a *failover* configuration, is a
> "spanning-tree portfast" feature so that your port doesn't transition
> through the different spantree states before forwarding traffic.
> 
> Kindly obtain the configuration from whoever has it and let us know.
> 
> 
> On 3/16/12 11:18 AM, Snoop wrote:
> > Hi Dweimer and Damien,
> > thanks for replying.
> > 
> > The server is connected to a switch of the datacentre. The configuration
> > of this switch is unknown to me and I obviously have no access to it but
> > I truly believe that such an enterprise environment has management
> > capabilities.
> > Anyway, in which way the configuration would affect the lagg
> > functionality? Might this issue be related to what stated in the FreeBSD
> > LAGG pages in the handbook?
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html
> > 
> > "Cisco® Fast EtherChannel®
> > 
> > Cisco Fast EtherChannel (FEC), is a static setup and does not negotiate
> > aggregation with the peer or exchange frames to monitor the link. If the
> > switch supports LACP then that should be used instead."
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:45 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >> Sorry top posting from phone.
> >>
> >>
> >> Show your switch's port configurations.
> >>
> >> We're using VLAN tagging over lagg failover interfaces at work and I have already tried the tests you described, to much better results.
> >>
> >> We're also running 8.2 so the only thing that seems to differ between us is the switch config, likely.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15 Mar 2012, at 20:06, Snoop <snoop@email.it> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>> a while after setting up my new server (with 8 jails in it) I've decided
> >>> (after postponing several times) to properly check the functionality of
> >>> the lagg and the result was very disappointing.
> >>>
> >>> The test I've done is very simple.
> >>> I've started copying a file from one site to another of my VPN network
> >>> (from the server I've been testing the net to another node somewhere
> >>> else) and in the meantime I've been physically disconnecting the main
> >>> network cable to check the responsiveness of the lagg configuration.
> >>> Then I've plugged the cable back to check if the traffic would switch
> >>> back to the main NIC as it should.
> >>>
> >>> The result was basically this (lagg0 members: bge0 primary, bge1
> >>> secondary)
> >>>
> >>> - when bge0 unplugged the traffic switched almost instantaneously to
> >>> bge1
> >>> - when bge0 plugged back in, the network stopped working completely with
> >>> the two NICs polling synchronously until I manually unplug bge1. Then
> >>> within 2-4 seconds traffic goes back on bge0 (I've been waiting for a
> >>> little more than a minute maximum to avoid all the active connections on
> >>> the server to timeout).
> >>>
> >>> Now, I've repeated the same test about 10-15 times randomly waiting for
> >>> different times between the unplug-replug procedure. The result was
> >>> always the same.
> >>>
> >>> So, below are the ipconfig outputs
> >>> - before to start the test
> >>> - when bge0 gets unplugged
> >>> - when bge0 gets plugged back in
> >>>
> >>> I couldn't see anything odd.
> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> >>> lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
> >>> 1500
> >>>
> >>> options=8009b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE>
> >>>        ether 00:14:ee:00:8a:c0
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.224 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xx.xx.255
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.227 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.227
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.225 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.225
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.2
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.3 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.3
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.4
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.5
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.6 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.6
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.226 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.226
> >>>        media: Ethernet autoselect
> >>>        status: active
> >>>        laggproto failover
> >>>        laggport: bge1 flags=0<>
> >>>        laggport: bge0 flags=5<MASTER,ACTIVE>
> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> >>> lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
> >>> 1500
> >>>
> >>> options=8009b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE>
> >>>        ether 00:14:ee:00:8a:c0
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.224 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xx.xx.255
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.227 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.227
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.225 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.225
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.2
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.3 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.3
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.4
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.5
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.6 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.6
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.226 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.226
> >>>        media: Ethernet autoselect
> >>>        status: active
> >>>        laggproto failover
> >>>        laggport: bge1 flags=4<ACTIVE>
> >>>        laggport: bge0 flags=1<MASTER>
> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
> >>> 1500
> >>>
> >>> options=8009b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE>
> >>>        ether 00:14:ee:00:8a:c0
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.224 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xx.xx.255
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.227 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.227
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.225 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.225
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.2
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.3 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.3
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.4
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.5
> >>>        inet 172.16.3.6 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 172.16.3.6
> >>>        inet xxx.xx.xx.226 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xx.xx.226
> >>>        media: Ethernet autoselect
> >>>        status: active
> >>>        laggproto failover
> >>>        laggport: bge1 flags=0<>
> >>>        laggport: bge0 flags=5<MASTER,ACTIVE>
> >>> __________________________________________________________________________________
> >>> Also nothing unusual on dmesg:
> >>>
> >>> .......
> >>> bge0: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge0: link state changed to UP
> >>> bge1: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge1: link state changed to UP
> >>> bge0: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge0: link state changed to UP
> >>> bge1: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge1: link state changed to UP
> >>> bge0: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge0: link state changed to UP
> >>> bge1: link state changed to DOWN
> >>> bge1: link state changed to UP
> >>> .......
> >>>
> >>> The following is the related configuration in rc.conf:
> >>>
> >>> .......
> >>> ifconfig_bge0="up"
> >>> ifconfig_bge1="up"
> >>> cloned_interfaces="lagg0"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport bge0 laggport bge1
> >>> xxx.xx.xx.224/24"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_0="inet xxx.xx.xx.225/32"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_1="inet xxx.xx.xx.226/32"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_2="inet xxx.xx.xx.227/32"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_3="inet 172.16.3.2/27"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_4="inet 172.16.3.3/27"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_5="inet 172.16.3.4/27"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_6="inet 172.16.3.5/27"
> >>> ifconfig_lagg0_alias_7="inet 172.16.3.6/27"
> >>> .......
> >>>
> >>> The system is an IBM xSeries 336 type 8837
> >>> kern.version: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27 18:45:57 UTC 2011
> >>>
> >>> Just for the record, I've done the test from the host (xxx.xx.xx.224/24)
> >>> not from any of the jail in place.
> >>> Any idea or similar issue around? Am I missing something?
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
> >>>
> >>> Sponsor:
> >>> Offerta speciale: a partire da soli Euro 18.90 puoi stampare le tue Foto su vera Tela Pittorica e creare Quadri fino a 80x50 cm!
> >>> Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11453&d=15-3
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> > 
> > 
> >  
> >  
> >  --
> >  Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
> >  
> >  Sponsor:
> >  ING DIRECT Conto Arancio. 4,20% per 12 mesi, zero spese, aprilo in due minuti!
> >  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11921&d=16-3
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


 
 
 --
 Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Innammorarsi è facile con Meetic, milioni di single si sono iscritti, si sono conosciuti e hanno riscoperto l'amore. Tutto con Meetic, prova anche tu!
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8292&d=16-3



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1331915503.4898.16.camel>