From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 20:32:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686A59B6808 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A06D82 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (75-48-78-19.lightspeed.cncrca.sbcglobal.net [75.48.78.19]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D248B98E; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:32:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: "palesius ." Subject: Re: Infiniband Documentation Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:26:08 -0700 Message-ID: <1880720.8TuMCCFLEC@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:32:44 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:32:45 -0000 On Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:53:04 AM palesius . wrote: > On: https://wiki.freebsd.org/InfiniBand > > it indicates several options that are needed in your KERNCONF. > Among them is: > > options OFED # Infiniband protocol stack and support > (needed for FreeBSD 9.X only) > > To me, that reads as if it is not needed for Freebsd 10. > > However, if you try to build the kernel without including OFED, you > will get many undefined reference to 'M_KMALLOC' among other things. > > Adding that option back, allows it to compile successfully (at least > on 10.1-stable). Fixed, thanks for the report! -- John Baldwin