From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 30 14:13:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06793 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:13:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldnews.quick.net ([207.212.170.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06788 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:13:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from donegan@oldnews.quick.net) Received: (from donegan@localhost) by oldnews.quick.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id OAA24245; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:13:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:13:20 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven P. Donegan" To: Mike Smith cc: Josh Tiefenbach , The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOW/MOSIX/Beowulf In-Reply-To: <199812302055.MAA05735@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Cool; thanks for the review. Anyone else using either the Netscape > server or experimenting with the OpenLDAP implementation are invited to > speak up; this sort of input's really useful. > I 'vampired' my corporate LDAP directory (roughly 15k entries) and populated a FreeBSD and Netscape system with it (FreeBSD was the ldap in the ports directory). Both systems were basically identical as far as hardware goes. The FreeBSD response to queries was roughly twice as fast as the Netscape under NT. Since the database was very small (5 meg or so) I would see no reason why this couldn't scale indefinitely... (round robin DNS or Cisco load director etc.). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message