Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:45:29 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix for undefined symbol 'panic' Message-ID: <20040125174359.C18713@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <20040125163017.GA20676@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040124173355.027d4508@mail.firetide.com> <20040125155351.X18713@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040125163017.GA20676@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Ken Smith wrote: KS>On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:55:32PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: KS> KS>> The fix is wrong, I think, because __panic now takes three arguments. KS>> I wrote phk a couple of days ago, but nothing happend so far. We could do KS>> the equivalent of __panic(str, NULL, 0), or try to get the filename and KS>> linenumber correct. But this is where my sparc asm foo stops. KS> KS>Thanks, I think you're right. KS> KS>My asm foo is rusty but I don't mind cleaning it up. I'll work on this KS>if nobody else wants to or has time or whatever. Shouldn't be too KS>hard to re-learn how to pass function parameters. But I don't want to KS>take away anyone else's fun if I'm stepping on toes. I'm new to this KS>area (sparc64 in general) in a variety of ways so I haven't noticed yet who KS>tends to do what. Go ahead. I think the arguments are passed in %o0, %o1 and %o2. I don't know in what order, however. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040125174359.C18713>