From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Dec  2 20:31:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA06681
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA06676
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:31:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA01381; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:31:24 -0800 (PST)
To: Ron Bolin <rlb@mindspring.com>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 2.2ALPHA Question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Dec 1996 22:37:07 EST."
             <32A3A063.41C67EA6@mindspring.com> 
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 20:31:24 -0800
Message-ID: <1377.849587484@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Is the 2.2 ALPHA code static? 

Every release is, by definition, static.  The CVS branch from which it
was derived generally isn't, however, unless it's truly an
end-of-branch scenario (as with 2.1.6.1).  You're probably interested
in the RELENG_2_2 branch, available from your friendly, local cvsup
server.
> AKA, there will be no formal fixes available until the 2.2 RLS? 

There will be a 2.2-BETA and possibly even a 2.2-GAMMA if we think
there's any merit to it.

> If fixes are available, how will they be delivered for testing purposes.
> CTM, CVS ?? 

CVS for now, CTM I'm not sure about.

					Jordan