Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:13:49 -0400
From:      "Kenta Suzumoto" <kentas@hush.com>
To:        "Fbsd8" <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ezjail and UPDATING20131010
Message-ID:  <20131012001349.9111660191@smtp.hushmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5258939C.2010909@a1poweruser.com>
References:  <20131011170340.47C726018E@smtp.hushmail.com> <5258939C.2010909@a1poweruser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 10/11/2013 at 8:11 PM, "Fbsd8" <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote:
>The jail rc.script environment in 10.0 has been patched to convert all 
>the jail rc.conf parameters to the new jail(8) format and then exec 
>jail(8). This is in preparation for depreciating the jail.conf jail 
>parameters.
>
>ezjail uses the rc.conf jail parameters and needs to be updated to use 
>the native jail(8) parameters. Until that gets done ezjail only works 
>with 9.2 and older versions of FreeBSD. The qjail utility uses the 
>native jail(8) parameters right now. Give it a try.

Thanks but no thanks. I'm not interested in a ripoff project that doesn't
give credit to the original work it stole from. I'll wait for ezjail to be updated
or hrs@ to submit his patch to -CURRENT.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131012001349.9111660191>