Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:48:31 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pfsync / 6-CURRENT-amd64 Message-ID: <200506261648.38553.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20050626021800.GB45376@saoirse.c4inet.net> References: <20050626020825.GA45376@saoirse.c4inet.net> <d5992baf0506251911521c172b@mail.gmail.com> <20050626021800.GB45376@saoirse.c4inet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1333771.dJi5A6kIMu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 26 June 2005 04:18, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 10:11:31PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > It seems to have broken around the 10th. > > That seems to confirm my suspicion that Brooks Davis' networking > changes have something to do with it. IIRC, he committed them > around that time. Can you verify that it breaks with if_pfsync.c,rev. 1.16? Unfortunately, r= ev.=20 1.17 happend just one hour after 1.16 and also includes serious changes to= =20 pfsync. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1333771.dJi5A6kIMu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCvsBGXyyEoT62BG0RAl0aAJ49r/OjgfXhKRH8vTnHYASo2ECEyACfThC4 CKUuW+o33JjR/xgwgfDcFlc= =NXNJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1333771.dJi5A6kIMu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506261648.38553.max>